Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Change in Gender Roles over Time free essay sample

The Evolving World of Gender Equality Gender roles in America throughout the 1900s have arguably undergone their most drastic shifts than any other century. While a shift in a mindset that focused more in equality was marked by the passage of women’s suffrage in 1920, the Popular Front movement that occurred from 1890 through 1934 and amid the Great Depression was an often overlooked, although an important, turning point for civil rights as a whole. With the start of the World War II in 1939 and men fighting overseas, the economic stimulus of wartime created jobs for women while men fought overseas. What was it that gave these women the power and courage to stand up for what they thought was right? How did they begin to transform what most considered a perfectly expectable part of society? By looking at writings, photos, and other works by prominent progressive women over the last century, we can get a real perspective on how gender roles have come so far. This paper aims at discovering how gender roles have progressed, what changed them, and who the main proponents of this change were. While social and economic pressures clearly set the path for changing gender roles, discontentment among women with their social status and the push by particular women from the ground up within the greater context of a civil rights overhaul set the precedent for a more equal America and shifting gender roles. Theoretical Perspective # 1 Feminist theory is the first theoretical perspective which I have chose to research. It addresses gender inequalities and puts forth a way to address these differences (Giddons 2012). The focus will be on two different sub categories of the feminist theory, which are liberal feminism and radical feminism. Liberal feminists do not blame men for their oppression; rather they blame it on a larger system where separate factors such as the media and discrimination in the work place are to blame. Liberal feminists actively strive for greater political power and support advances such as the Equal Pay Act (Giddons, 2012). On the other hand radical feminism is based on the view that women’s oppression is solely the male’s fault. They fight strongly against patriarchy (the domination of females by males), and some radical feminist goes as far as to say that female oppression can only be stopped by overthrowing the patriarchal system (Giddons 2012). Sociologist Shulamith Firestone was a very influential radical feminist. Her book The Dialectic of sex: A Case for Feminist Revolution caused a political riot when it was released. She describes how men will always be superior to women until science makes it possible for either gender to be able to give birth. She explains that it is impossible for female oppression to end if they have to be dependent on men financially and physically during pregnancy. This gives the man a supreme authority over women that no law or political policy could remedy. Other radical feminists believe that male violence, including rape, sexual harassment, and relationship violence are all key factors to male supremacy (Giddons 2012). Throughout history, both liberal and radical feminists have fought actively to the end oppression of women by men. They have made enormous strides to gain gender equality and their efforts have been paying off. Theoretical Approach #2 The next theory which I researched was the attachment theory. Even though most people believe it to be outdated, it fits very well with the research topic. The attachment theory is based on the idea that there is a learned relationship between mother and child (Giddons, 2012). The attachment theory is another form of the functional approach; which is the belief that society is like a system of parts that when working smoothly, produce a social equilibrium. In other words, men and women perform the tasks in which they are best suited for. Men being better suiting for physical labor, and women being better suited to raise the children. Sociologist John Bowlby argued that the presence of the mother during childhood was critical to the mental and social stability in the child. His Maternal Deprivation thesis was used by some to argue that a mother who worked was remiss to her children and that it could lead to serious psychological and social difficulties later on in life (Giddons 2012). Anthropologist George Murdock, also a functionalist, did a study in 200 different societies and concluded that each had a social division of labor (Giddons 2012). This leads back to the point of John Bowlby that the mother is critical, if not biological in the development of children. Functionalist theories are views of the past, as they deprive women of rights and free will. There is evidence that shows that children with two working parents have higher academic scores and personally development, which is completely contradictory to the Maternal Deprivation these (attachment theory). As society has progressed we have learned to accept the claims of past â€Å"academics† as nothing more than bogus reading material as we build a world that is free of gender inequality. Disscusion The traditional outlook of â€Å"man as the hunter† and â€Å"woman as the mother† in the Victorian era (1837-1901) carried on well beyond primitive societies into early industrialization and advanced social development. America was still a considered a new nation and â€Å"freedom† was most aptly applied to wealthy, white men. Although small advancements had been made, such as the 1939 Mississippi grant for women to hold property, they still needed to have their husband’s permission first (Brooks, 2008). Undoubtedly, the primary role of the woman was to bear and raise children, partly due to high infant mortality rates. As modern medicine advanced, woman went from bearing an average of 15 children in the 18th century to only five in the 19th (World Health Organization) although only five percent of married women still worked outside the home. Gender roles were deeply ingrained in America’s sociological fiber, and the Industrial Revolution truly segregated the working world of men form the private sector of women. The domesticity and submission of women went hand-in-hand with repression of the era as a whole, and â€Å"Many 19th century physicians accepted Darwinism and concluded that women had stopped evolving sooner than men and were, therefore, less developed,† (Shultz, 1999). With the mindset that women were scientifically and genetically inferior to men, it’s no wonder that women were seen as having no place in the workforce. However, the outlook that women should be subservient to their husbands and left out of decision-making was quickly becoming a stale ideology, particularly to women. One example of this was a â€Å"Letter to the Editor† sent to the evening post in 1896, when a Domestic Servant’s â€Å"Half-Holiday† Bill was voted on by men. In the letter, the woman writes to the editor that, â€Å"men would do well to consult their wives, or some women who have had experience in household matters, before they rush in and try to upset arrangements that have worked so satisfactorily, and which are in the department in which women alone are experts,† (Evening Post, Volume LII, Issue 34, 1896,). Women clearly were reaching a point in which they wanted to be consulted and asked for their opinion, particularly in the matters they were supposed to know best. Despite the female mindset, any women, particularly immigrants, who wanted to work, were mostly confined to jobs as laundresses, servants, and the lowest forms of factory help. Women who did work were generally single. Female discontentment with their status in society came to a head at Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848, when the Women’s Rights Movement began. At the conference from July 19 to July20, the â€Å"Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments† was signed after being modeled on the Declaration of Independence. Drafted by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, the Declaration of Sentiments called for the ending of â€Å"absolute tyranny† that white men had in America, as well as the tyranny of a husband over his wife. The National Woman Suffrage Association actively apposed the 15th Amendment since it gave only African-American men the right to vote, accepted only women into the organization, and began to harshly criticize American society. As one female activist, Victoria Vlaflin Woodhull stated, â€Å"We mean treason†¦We are plotting Revolution. † While the conference focused on women’s rights in the United States, the conference gave way to the overarching issue of civil rights as a whole, and the need for social change beyond what upper class, white men found acceptable. The following decades leading into the early 20th century were a period of small gains for women, more pragmatic associations that worked toward equality and the right to vote, and sparked other equality movements not only for women, but for African-Americans, Immigrants, and unfairly treated workers. All these different movements came to a head in the early 20th century during the Great Depression, and the infrequently discussed Popular Front. The 1930s and 40s were an era in which the demand for social justice dominated the ideology of America. Known as â€Å"The Age of the Proletariat,† it focused on not only worker’s revolution, but a mass push for social equality and equal rights for anyone who wanted to work and earn a fair wage. It became a time where women could earn their voice in literature, art, and the economy because of an overarching movement for fairness. One of the greatest and most obvious ways women began to make their mark on society was through writing and photojournalism. As certain women became more prominent and highlighted the plight of the woman as a worker and American, their suffering became real and tangible, and not only did their work highlight the conditions of other women in factories who were doing unfair labor, but they paved the way to finally give women a voice. During the Popular Front and the Great Depression, oppression and poverty were not restricted to any class, gender, or ethnicity, Margaret Bourke-White pioneered the world of photojournalism to represent social struggle in the 1930’s. Bourke-White’s photojournalistic novel â€Å"You Have Seen Their Faces,† highlighted the ideals of the glaring disparity between the wealthy white men in America and the rest of society and provided the visual representation for change. Margaret Bourke-White’s photojournalism was just one photojournalist who pushed through the narrow scope of men in the workforce to become a household name. Dorothea Lange worked to capture the plight of the migrant farmer during the dustbowl, and she created symbols of the Great Depression to not only emphasize the impoverishment of farmers, but the blending of class lines among the poorest in America. One of her most famous pieces, â€Å"Migrant Mother† depicts a mother sitting between her two children. The mother clutches her chin and gazes into the distance, looking both worried and determined. Her clothes are dirty, her face is heavily aged with wrinkles and creases, and her children face away from the camera and rest themselves on her should, as if physically placing the burden of mothering on a woman who has no answers. The photo highlighted the need for social change, the shifting representation of a woman as a stronghold in the household, and the paralyzing effect of a lack of representation among the voiceless in America. Migrant Mother† gave a recognizable symbol to an otherwise faceless movement centered around gender oppression, worker’s oppression, and extreme poverty blind to gender or race. Finally, one of the most prominent women to arise during the Popular Front era and establish a precedent of strong women: Margaret Mitchell. Writing Gone With the Wind in 1936 and receiving a Pulitzer Prize for it in 1937, Mitchell’s heroine, Scarlett O’Ha ra, represents the need for survival and the changing atmosphere of America during the Reconstruction era. While her novel served as an essential anti-civil rights movement, her message was greater than the context of the story. O’Hara spends the novel trying to escape poverty by any means necessary, and her plight resounded among society of people who were also facing inescapable impoverishment. While these women undoubtedly contributed to the slowly improving social status of women, their contribution came at a time when America needed restructuring, and within the greater context of the Popular Front and the Great Depression, it was a ime women could begin to make a greater impact. Census figures show that the percentage of women employed who were 14 or older actually rose from 24. 3 percent in 1930 to 25. 4 percent in 1940, totaling two million jobs. Furthermore, many more married women were entering the workforce (Ware, 2009). The times called for women to enter the workforce simply to support their families, but the change was less than welcome. As New Deal initiatives were t aking place, such as the Wagner Act, which established the 40-hour workweek, women were often left out of these new initiatives. Women still were inclined to fight back. In a 1931 New York Times article, it states that a â€Å"plea for help for unemployed factory women, who â€Å"seem to have been ignored† in the plans of work relief was made by the Consumers’ League to†¦the chairman of emergency unemployment Relief Committee† (Job Relief Urged by Factory Women, 1931). Such sentiment was common, and women struggled to be treated as equal citizens despite the influx of strong female figures in society. The National Recovery Administration continued to set lower minimum wages for women performing the same jobs as men, the Civil Works Administration and the Civilian Corps Administration gave jobs almost exclusively to men, and women were forced back into sewing jobs. The Social Security Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act did not cover women’s employment when they were first instilled, and even though women’s employment was on the rise, America seemed hell-bent on maintaining the â€Å"man as the breadwinner† identity. Women were expected to see their roles in the household as enhanced and the make life at home as comfortable as possible with fewer resources, while men were expected to find a job, despite the almost insurmountable struggle. It almost seemed as though America wanted to turn a blind eye to that fact that women clearly were attempting to enter the workforce. Any women who entered the workforce were seen as â€Å"stealing† jobs from men, and that they shouldn’t be working anyway. Women were assumed to be unable to handle labor-intensive jobs. By 1939, the number of employed women equaled the total number of unemployed Americans, and Norm Cousins, a prominent New York Post political journalist and activist, famously said the solution was to â€Å"simply fire the women, who shouldn’t be working anyway, and hire the men. Presto! No unemployment, No relief rolls. No depression. † Why, in the midst of strong female voices, a working situation where any work for any person was welcome, and the need for social and economic reform, was America so unwilling to accept women into the labor force? Society had already separated jobs by gender, and it seemed almost a backtrack to disallow women, who had already accomplished so much as writers and photojournalists and muckrakers, to deny them the right to earn for their families. In a time when people needed answers for why they were so oppressed, women, immigrants, and African-Americans were often used at the scapegoat. Women’s oppression did not exist in isolation during the Great Depression, but was a product of complex and often exhausting interaction between the changing economic atmosphere and the contention with existing ideologies. Inevitably, something had to give. Thus, women were seen as destroying the sanctity of marriage by trying to change their role within the context of the family, and strong voices were only viewed as greater sources of the problem. Perhaps the strongest female voice of the Great Depression, Eleanor Roosevelt, said in her book, It’s Up to the Women that â€Å"the women know that life must go on and that the needs of life must be met and it is their courage and determination which, time and again, have pulled us through worse crises than the present one. Her words were meant to empower the woman, it emphasized their need to be the family rock, as opposed to become another breadwinner, and that paralleled that lack of female representation in New Deal Initiatives. Although she was hailed as the strongest female of her time, women’s contribution needed to extend beyond the household, and America had a strong reluctance to let that happen. Women were supposed to be seen as a comfort and a sense of stability in the household, and coming home to an empty house while the woman was out working seemed like a confusing, let alone discomforting, role reversal. Feminism was viewed as movement creating waves and making trouble in a time that was already hard enough, and fighting for the right to work and provide for oneself as a woman directly contradicted the maternal outlook they previously held. Feminists rejected Maternalism as the only path a woman could take, and the more they tried to thrust themselves away from that light, they more they were seen as anarchists in a time that was already marred by chaos. In an article by Jane Humphries, entitled â€Å"Women: Scapegoats and Safety Valves in the Great Depression,† she discusses that one of the main reasons women were blamed was because they were expected to receive and willingly took lower wages than a white man would in the same position. She adds, â€Å"Coupled with the effect of the Great Depression more generally, inevitably pointed to increased female employment and a persistence even after the Depression in the great disparity between men’s and women’s earning scales. It would seem that, because women were unable to enter the workforce on their own terms, they had not only become their own worst enemy, but were unintentionally making men their enemy because of their circumstance as well. From here, gender identity shifted from women as a source of solace and relief during difficult times, to direct competition for resources and wages. Obviously, they weren’t to blame. Among the turmoil of the Great De pression, the fight for gender equality and civil rights, and the New Deal Initiative came the biggest economic stimulus to pull American out of its hardest time: World War II. Suddenly, wartime efforts called for serious factory work, and women began to work long day-jobs to support the war. Not only did women want to work due to their patriotism, but a whole new wave of propaganda – particularly the â€Å"Rosie the Riveter† image – encouraged women the join factory workers. By 1945, 2. 2 million women were working in war industries, building ships, aircrafts, vehicles, and weaponry. Even 400,000 women were serving in the military, and they finally gained recognition as a not only helpful, but vital part of a movement. In an article by Dr. Sharon H. Hartman Strom and Linda P. Wood entitle â€Å"What did You do in the War, Grandma? † They argue that the war â€Å"widened the horizons of American women. † Women were no longer confined to clerical work and the lowest paying jobs, but were expected to contribute while the men were away at war. The tremendous shortage of labor guaranteed women a spot in the labor force, but Hartman and Wood argue that it was not necessarily their patriotism that sent the running to the factories, but the joy of and sense of accomplishment of finally being able to make their own money. Women were finally acknowledged as helpful, the impoverishment and emotional turmoil due to economic crisis during the Great Depression was over, and women finally had a sense of purpose. Hartman and Wood cite this time as when gender segregation and racial segregation finally started to see their walls break down, and â€Å"the genie was out of the bottle and could not be back in. † In a 1942 Deseret News entitled â€Å"More Women Called To Work: War Department States New Job Policy,† it states that â€Å"the War Department has adopted a policy of using women employees in all capacities, for which they are qualified or may become so by training. Suddenly, the concept that women were incapable of doing the same job as men was shattered, and the inferiority of women was temporary suspended. Classified articles call for women to come to textile mills, aviation factories, and weaponry factories earning wages of over $30. 00 per week for their efforts. The â€Å"Rosie the Riveters† of America forever affected the nation’s view of strength and the ability of women to be constructive members of the workface and complete tasks previously only held by men. Propaganda encouraged women to see themselves as independent and hardworking, and women were expected to prove themselves during the war. They were encouraged to take advantage of their new opportunities. This newfound belief in a woman’s ferocity was only a temporary fix for the war that eventually gave way to the â€Å"Susie Homemaker† image when the war ended and men returned to reclaim their jobs. However, the impact had been made. The war politicized women and made them more conscious of their power in the United States. They realized that they could make a strong impact if given the chance, and the push from the bottom in the 1930s was realized during the war. In â€Å"The Life and Times of Rosie the Riveter: Invisible Working Women† by Sue Davenport, she argues that the women have always worked longer and harder than men for the same recognition, and wartime was one of the moments in history where they received recognition for it. She says, â€Å"crossing the traditional sex barrier in the workforce sharpened women’s understanding of how sexual division of labor pitted men against women and created hardship and false ideas in people’s lives. Propaganda in during the war reaffirmed women’s notions that could be strong, active members of society, and that confirmation in conjunction with the initial fight in the early 1900s gave way to a feminist movement to redefine gender roles in society. Indeed, it was an unusual circumstance that gave women this fresh identity, but i t was the identification they need to truly get the ball rolling. There’s no doubt that the end of the war brought upon a demobilization of women in the workforce, and a step backward in terms of the labor movement for women. â€Å"Rosie the Riveter† was long gone, and women were expected to ive up their jobs to men. Despite this issue, many women were inspired to enter the labor force long term, and in the article â€Å"The Postwar Role of American Women,† by Mary Anderson, she states the labor force of women between 1948 and 1985 grew from 29 percent to 45 percent as women’s labor force participation jumped from 33 percent to 35 percent. This indicates a permanent change in attitude that lasted long after the war. Women were inspired to create things like daycare, and the identity of women to solely take care of their children was slowly being broken down. After the war, a poll taken in 1945 by the Women’s Bureau of the Department of Labor showed that ? of women wanted to keep their jobs. Responding to the call to work during the war brought upon an invigorating sense of pride for women that, although was stifled by the housewife-mindset of the 1950s, never truly subsided and was only waiting to gain to steam again. With the Equal Pay Act passing in 1963, it was just another sign that the movement had simply been dormant, and in no way had died. The 1960s showed a reinvigoration of the women’s movement with the Civil Rights Act as well, which extended laws prohibiting occupation due to sex. Women’s battle toward equality almost seemed to gloss over the 1950s, but the interim was not surprising. The reluctance toward shifting gender roles was never a matter of women simply doing their civic duty during wartime efforts, but the unwillingness of men to see women as their social equals. Men saw women as trying to oust them from their jobs, and coming home to a labor force that was no longer as divided by gender was a new and suspicious change in the male eye. Men had never worked next to women before, so it was no wonder that there was obstinacy. The male attitude that women should return to their status as homemakers is an ideology that still persists in today’s society. In a study at the University of Washing called, â€Å"The Effects of Attitudes Toward Family Life and Gender Roles on Marital Satisfaction,† researchers Diane N. Lye and Timothy J. Biblarz determined that husbands and wives who hold nontraditional attitudes toward family life are less satisfied with their marriages. Gender roles in America have come a long way since the late 1800s, where women couldn’t even own land without the permission from their husbands. The changing tides of the economy in conjunction with social movements such as the Popular Front and wartime efforts were undeniably one of the biggest factors. However, movements start from the ground up, and without the push from prominent women who broke the barriers of what it meant to for a woman to be a productive member of society, women may not have been as inspired to work during World War II or encouraged to keep going after the war. It took several strong voices (Margaret Bourke-White, Dorothea Lange, and Margaret Mitchell are just some of many) to help women realize that gender identity is a construct created by a society designed to work against them. Once the opportunity came for women to prove themselves as dynamic workers, capable of manual labor and better-paying jobs, it was almost perfect timing. This is not to say that the gender role of women does not have a long way to go, and while the Rosie the Riveter image was a positive piece of propaganda at the time, it should only be used as a template for how women should be viewed in the coming years. In an age of corporations and big business, the concept of â€Å"gender roles† should be a term that slowly dies. In a Washington Post article entitled, â€Å"Laws fail to remedy workplace inequality of women,† it emphasizes the underlying imbalance between men and women in top positions of power. This often talked about â€Å"glass ceiling† is still a very real issue that women face daily, and equal pay still have not been addressed sufficiently. If asked what â€Å"gender role† means, the average person would still answer that it entails the man goes to work while the woman cares for the child. The article states that, â€Å"women still have less success in the workplace than do childless women. Men, by contrast, see their workplace fortunes improve after they become fathers. † Women are expected to â€Å"juggle† home life and work life because motherhood is still considered to be their primary job. For men, on the other hand, work comes first and family life comes second. What can be done to level the playing field for everyone so gender roles finally can be viewed the same? The issue extends far beyond women simply ioneering for equal pay and equal representation in the workplace, and must also focus on the changing outlook of the man as a primary parent. While the â€Å"stay-at-home-dad† is becoming an increasingly common scenario, particularly in such difficult economic times, the Washington Post article states that â€Å"American families sorely need paid family leave. † Maternity leave, although necessary, is an outdated concept, and men ne ed and want to make their families their first priority, but are as confined the breadwinner role as women are to the homemaker role. Stay-at-home dads are often looked down upon, and men are expected to earn a wage that a family could subsist on alone. Men feel inferior to a woman that earns a higher wage. The concept of gender roles goes both ways, and it is just as important to encourage men to step outside their comfort zone as women. Only then will the idea of gender roles in America truly begin to morph, which will allow anyone to pursue the lifestyle that they desire. Women and men alike must understand that this battle of gender equality is far from over.

Friday, April 24, 2020

Unanswered Questions on Topics about Social Issues

Unanswered Questions on Topics about Social Issues Being among the worst kinds of categorization in the contemporary Earth, racism has altered the social lives of individuals. Becoming conscious of the problems happening in the nation and the world and wanting to understand marginalized people is quite important. Make sure once you think about a particular issue and the way to address it, you consider how to address it for everyone and not only for people that are privileged in every other facet of their life. When you go searching for reasons and underlying causes for significant difficulties, you will likely find several. The Supreme Strategy for Topics about Social Issues For Writing a Good Essay you need to choose superior topics. You should be certain to understand everything clearly once you select an essay topic. Taking essay outline help isn't that much crucial as finding an excellent essay for the topic that's primary. You ought to make sure you've picked an adeq uate topic so that you may submit a high-quality essay. Our group had an opportunity to pay a visit to the Hacienda Luisita and speak to the farmers about their struggle for land reform. Besides teen pregnancy, there are a large number of important identified social issues in the USA today. There is a particular fragility of revenue and social position in France. As a consequence, social issues can be raised by the unequal distribution of funding between public schools, like that seen in the usa. Also, a couple mistakes need to be made for the progress to occur, and everything must be questioned for the answers to appear. There are an infinite number of on-line blogs and articles written by marginalized people, along with YouTube vlogs by marginalized people that address a lot of the issues you will need to learn about. Describe ways that all kinds of prejudice and bias are or aren't interconnected in your perspective. Marijuana may be used in the health care domain, and th ere's no accurate truth that shows marijuana kills. The 5-Minute Rule for Topics about Social Issues Remaining silent on the issues is a tremendous portion of the issue. Social issues have always been an essential part of the human condition. It would be simpler to learn more about the theme and write about doing it. Social problems often involve issues that influence the true world. The end result of such unbalanced maturation of society is discontent and grave social problems like poverty. Absence of education is among the significant reasons why there is poverty in the nation. Social justice issues can happen in connection with practically any facet of society where inequality can arise because of unjust prejudices or policies. Because of the stigma attached, discussing issues associated with mental wellness is still considered a taboo. Details of Topics about Social Issues By way of example, today, the old-fashioned face-to-face conversation was phased out by social networking platforms which promise more connectivity irrespective of distance. It is very important to understand that not all things that take place in society are raised to the amount of social issues. A number of different reasons could possibly be influencing the issue, in various quantities, all at the exact same moment. A social problem is normally a term used to refer to problems with a specific area or group of men and women in the world. The solution might be more difficult still. The very best solution to a specific problem could possibly be policy change of some kind, for example, and the ideal route to that may be to mount an advocacy effort geared toward officials who can make it take place. Implanted GPS methods threaten privacy. You must write a minumum of one research paper in a semester for most the subjects. Social issues transcend almost every facet of the society, and for that reason, given the job of writing an essay on social issues, one is indirectly given the opportunity to select from the multitude of topics within the area. When selecting your research paper topic, you should make certain it is neither boring nor worn out. Throughout the life program, there are social problems related to diverse ages. Utilize whatever you know to reveal your knowledge of the planet, and bring out good old philosophical theories. Given such a job, make sure that you understand or have a notion about a partic ular social issue you want to manage. Debate topics generally are supposed to hold to attention of listeners, and we have some which are guaranteed to hold anybody's interest! When selecting your social problems topic, don't forget that it's always far better to write about something you're already more or less acquainted with. In order to have an intriguing debate, you first have to get an intriguing debate topic. Sociology is, undoubtedly, a fascinating subject, particularly if you're fortunate enough to find a progressive-thinking professor. You must realize that controversy doesn't indicate a personal insult.

Essay Topics - What Is The Essay Topics For This Year?

Essay Topics - What Is The Essay Topics For This Year?While looking for FTE What Are The Essay Topics For 2020, one of the questions I am often asked is, 'What will I be asked on the test?' While some tests ask a lot of essay questions, others may only have five or six. My experience suggests that any question that you can answer with a little research, rather than just thinking about it all day, will help you get a higher grade. And here are some of the topics for the FTE This year.This question usually asks you to write about a topic that you are passionate about and one that you feel would be interesting for someone to read about. So the best thing to do is think about why you want to read about the topic in the first place. This question will force you to come up with ideas and resources for your essay.Another one of the FTE This year is the question What are the types of issues that people may need to address? This question will more likely ask you to write about a specific topi c, but you will also be asked to list reasons that relate to the topic, and then add your sources for those reasons.Finally, another possible question would be about how the topic relates to the different time periods that we live in. You will also be asked to list reasons for why each time period was different, and why it still has so many differences. You will also be asked to look at issues related to technology, and how it has changed the way people live their lives.While you are writing about these types of topics, you will find that you need to include many other details as well. That's because the context of these topics is very important. You will also find that there is a lot of different things that you can include when you are trying to write a good essay.One question, for example, would be 'How would history have changed if we hadn't developed the internet?' Or 'What changes would we have seen if our society were no longer motivated by private cars?' These types of quest ions can be taken out of many history classes, and you will be able to apply them to other types of topics as well.Keep in mind that these are only a few of the above topics for the FTE this year. But they can be useful guides to what the questions will likely be asking you. If you are looking for FTE What Is The Essay Topics For 2020, I would suggest that you follow my advice and do some research before you start writing.Make sure that you know the information that is most important to you, and write down everything that you think is important for your essay. Then do your research.

Things You Should Know About Essay Writing Articles

Things You Should Know About Essay Writing Articles Academic writing is getting a source of employment for many on-line freelancers resulting in a highly competitive market online. The writers should be one who value our clients and strive to meet their requirements. Research on several different article writing jobs on the internet is the perfect way to get the job you want. Trusted writing sites can be found the Internet with several opportunities for different writers who need to place their skills to practice. BKA Content BKA Content is a website that focuses on the invention of content for unique industries. The research can help you to be aware of the deep facts and figures about the topics so you can create your content a robust and valuable one. The ability to create high-quality paper is really important and intricate skill. You know they say if you wish to acquire new understanding of the specific question you should write a paper. In school, essay writing has been made to be part of our learning activity. It is one of the significant assignments that are being assigned to students at every level of studies. Life After Essay Writing Articles Essay writing has at all times been part of academic life. While some might call essay writing a skill, but if one understands the strategies and tricks and can master them, essay writing may not be such a struggle. Writing articles is a kind of art Truly There's a particular flair necessary to string together the appropriate words, infused with a potent message delivered in a subtle fashion and ensure it is interesting enough that reader's scroll through the whole article. Writing an introduction provides the readers an idea what you're likely to include or conclude in your essay. Essay Writing Articles - Is it a Scam? 1 idea may result in a complete time income or a multi-million dollar enterprise. Don't be worried if you've got zero writing experience in case your skills prove to be usefu l, you've as many probability of finding the job as the people with years of experience. If you're talented in writing, you may use your skills to make a living instead of searching for employment in places that you're uncertain. Bear in mind the age, occupation of your possible audience, whether it's a school teacher or admission officer. The Appeal of Essay Writing Articles The way the essay is written will predict the writers knowledge on a specific topic. Writing guest posts is among the tasks we receive from our clients. Essay writing demands proper understanding of the principal supply of the subject that one wants to write on. It should involve a clear understanding of the concerned task. What You Need to Do About Essay Writing Articles Before You Miss Your Chance There's 1 assignment, however, that causes more frayed nerves than every other. Although everyone can develop into an independent writer, freelance writing jobs in Pakistan still have a reasonable selecti on practice. So far as your academic related writing needs are involved, there are a lot of people available to assist you in your essay writing tasks. You will not just delight in writing but also earn great money with your abilities. Even for those who have a word count to stick to, make sure you don't just drag on your article for the interest of it. There's no special key to writing. Content writers must be extremely vigilant concerning the use of grammar and syntax. While being an excellent writer does require decent use of English language, it is not the only requirement. Initially glance becoming an independent on-line writer seems to be an opportunity of a lifetime. You're likely to need to be in a position to accept the simple fact that the majority of people get so many applications they won't ever reply to your emails. The worth of writers is still not as it must be. You may be the next one in the event you have writing skills, research capability and expressi ng ability that could bring in many readers. Writing top quality essay requires a lot of time, energy, and energy. Please do not be worried about the essence of the work you will complete. Following that, you may give your work to somebody else to read it over. Evidently, your work has to be original work. Another way to improve the probability of getting your articles accepted is to get a friend proofread your article. Also, make sure that the ideas that you're likely to present won't contradict each other. Based on our experience, here are a few pointers and our secret strategies to writing fantastic and impactful articles! Your blog ought to be that reason.

How to Find a Sample Entrance Essay For Graduate School

How to Find a Sample Entrance Essay For Graduate SchoolFinding a sample entrance essay for graduate school can be a daunting task. The student looking for something to write about should make sure that the essay meets his or her own personal expectations. Graduate students often think they need to write a dissertation, but they are usually happy to get some personal knowledge from the information they can find online. So what can the student use?The student looking for a sample essay needs to look at the objective and sample paragraphs found in the student handbook. Then, if he or she finds something that interests them, they can bring it back to the instructor to work with. If a sample is available, this should be able to be found in the course syllabus, as well.A course syllabus will usually contain a list of topics that are covered in each unit. Students must always think about what the instructor would want them to cover in the thesis. Some professors prefer that their students d iscuss an idea with reference to other similar topics, while others like to see more traditional essays, in which the student explains an idea through an examination of relevant real-life situations.Another resource available is the text book that the student has to fill out for their thesis. These can either be online, or printed copies that the student can take home with them. A student's instructor should be able to help them locate a copy of a particular book. In most cases, the student should be able to obtain all the information they need from the book.Theses can be uploaded to sites that provide samples, so the student may choose a topic that they feel most comfortable with. This allows the student to get a first impression on the topic and then a second. After this, the student can decide if they wish to write about this topic in their main thesis. This also helps a student decide on their writing style, and how they want to layout the topic.Theses usually take anywhere from one week to a month, and the student will probably need to have written several essays by the time the entry exam is due. So it is very important that the student understand what they are expected to do, and how they should go about it.Finding a sample entrance essay for graduate school should not be all that hard. What the student is looking for is a chance to write about something they are passionate about. This may sound very superficial but think about what your professor expects from you, and you may find it is not as bad as you think.

Thursday, April 16, 2020

John Austins Theory of Sovereignty free essay sample

The concept of sovereignty is one of the most complex in political science, with many definitions, some totally contradictory. Usually, sovereignty is defined in one of two ways. The first definition applies to supreme public power, which has the right and, in theory, the capacity to impose its authority in the last instance. The second definition refers to the holder of legitimate power, who is recognized to have authority. When national sovereignty is discussed, the first definition applies, and it refers in particular to independence, understood as the freedom of a collective entity to act. When popular sovereignty is discussed, the second definition applies, and sovereignty is associated with power and legitimacy. Sovereignty and Political Authority On the international level, sovereignty means independence, i. e. , noninterference by external powers in the internal affairs of another state. International norms are based on the principle of the sovereign equality of independent states; international law excludes interference and establishes universally-accepted rules. We will write a custom essay sample on John Austins Theory of Sovereignty or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Thus, sovereignty is eminently rational, if not dialectical, since the sovereignty of a state depends not only on the autonomous will of its sovereign, but also on its standing vis-a-vis other sovereign states. From this perspective, one can say that the sovereignty of any single state is the logical consequence of the existence of several sovereign states. It is thus a serious mistake to assume that sovereignty is possible only within the framework of the classic type of state, i. e. , a nation-state, as do representatives of the â€Å"realist† school, such as Alan James and F. H. Hinsley, or neo-Marxist theoreticians like Justin Rosenberg. One should not confuse the concepts of nation and state, which do not necessarily belong together, or assume that the concept of sovereignty was formulated clearly only in terms of the theory of the state. Closer to the truth is John Hoffman’s assertion that â€Å"sovereignty has been an insoluble problem ever since it became associated with the state. Even though a concept of sovereignty did not exist before the 16th century, it does not follow that the phenomenon did not exist in political reality, and that it could not have been conceptualized differently. For example, Aristotle does not mention sovereignty, but the fact that he insists on the necessity for a supreme power shows that he was familiar with the idea, since any supreme power — kuphian aphen with the Greeks; summum imperium with the Romans — is sovereign by definition. Sovereignty is not related to any particular form of government or to any particular political organization; on the contrary, it is inherent in any form of political authority. The problem with sovereignty appeared at the end of the Middle Ages, when the question posed was no longer only about the best form of government or the limits of political authority, but about the relation between the government and the people, i. e. , the relation between ruler and ruled in a political community. What is sovereignty? Alain de Benoist 1. 2 John Austin Austins basic approach was to ascertain what can be said generally, but still with interest, about all laws. Austins analysis can be seen as either a paradigm of, or a caricature of, analytical philosophy, in that his discussions are dryly full of distinctions, but are thin in argument. The modern reader is forced to fill in much of the meta-theoretical, justificatory work, as it cannot be found in the text. Where Austin does articulate his methodology and objective, it is a fairly traditional one: he â€Å"endeavored to resolve a  law  (taken with the largest signification which can be given to that term  properly) into the necessary and essential elements of which it is composed† As to what is the core nature of law, Austins answer is that laws (â€Å"properly so called†) are commands of a sovereign. He clarifies the concept of positive law (that is, man-made law) by analyzing the constituent concepts of his definition, and by distinguishing law from other concepts that are similar: * â€Å"Commands† involve an expressed wish that something be done, combined with a willingness and ability to impose â€Å"an evil† if that wish is not complied with. Rules are general commands (applying generally to a class), as contrasted with specific or individual commands (â€Å"drink wine today† or â€Å"John Major must drink wine†). Positive law consists of those commands laid down by a sovereign (or its agents), to be contrasted to other law-givers, like Gods general commands, and the general commands of an employer to an employee. * The â€Å"sovereign† is defined as a person (or determinate body of persons) who receives habitual obedience from the bulk of the population, but who does not habitually obey any other (earthly) person or institution. Austin thought that all independent political societies, by their nature, have a sovereign. * Positive law should also be contrasted with â€Å"laws by a close analogy† (which includes positive morality, laws of honor, international law, customary law, and constitutional law) and â€Å"laws by remote analogy† (e. g. , the laws of physics). Austin also wanted to include within â€Å"the province of jurisprudence† certain â€Å"exceptions,† items which did not fit his criteria but which should nonetheless be studied with other â€Å"laws properly so called†: repealing laws, declarative laws, and â€Å"imperfect laws†Ã¢â‚¬â€laws prescribing action but without sanctions (a concept Austin ascribes to â€Å"Roman [law] jurists In the criteria set out above, Austin succeeded in delimiting law and legal rules from religion, morality, convention, and custom. However, also excluded from â€Å"the province of jurisprudence† were customary law (except to the extent that the sovereign had, directly or indirectly, adopted such customs as law), public international law, and parts of constitutional law. Within Austins approach, whether something is or is not â€Å"law† depends on which people have done what: the question turns on an empirical investigation, and it is a matter mostly of power, not of morality. Of course, Austin is not arguing that law should not be moral, nor is he implying that it rarely is. Austin is not playing the nihilist or the skeptic. He is merely pointing out that there is much that is law that is not moral, and what makes something law does nothing to guarantee its moral value. â€Å"The most pernicious laws, and therefore those which are most opposed to the will of God, have been and are continually enforced as laws by judicial tribunals† In contrast to his mentor Bentham, Austin, in his early lectures, accepted judicial lawmaking as â€Å"highly beneficial and even absolutely necessary†). Nor did Austin find any difficulty incorporating judicial lawmaking into his command theory: he characterized that form of lawmaking, along with the occasional legal/judicial recognition of customs by judges, as the â€Å"tacit commands† of the sovereign, the sovereigns affirming the â€Å"orders† by its acquiescence. It should be noted, however, that one of Austins later lectures listed the many problems that can come with judicial legislation, and recommended codification of the law instead.

Friday, March 13, 2020

Good and Evil in Lord of the Flies and Animal Farm Essay Essays

Good and Evil in Lord of the Flies and Animal Farm Essay Essays Good and Evil in Lord of the Flies and Animal Farm Essay Essay Good and Evil in Lord of the Flies and Animal Farm Essay Essay Essay Topic: The Hunger Games Good and evil subjects. in some signifier. be in practically every piece of literature of all time written. It is found in literature every bit old as the Bible to newer narratives such as The Hunger Games. It is no surprise to happen this same subject in Lord of the Fliess by William Golding and Animal Farm by George Orwell. Golding and Orwell explore good and evil to demo what consequence morality. or the deficiency thereof. has on society. Both Golding and Orwell believe through their ain yesteryear experiences that evil corrupts people. To portray this. Orwell and Golding use similar thoughts with their characters and secret plan to demo how delicate the thought of civilisation is for us all. : In Lord of the Fliess and Animal Farm. the subject of immorality is obvious throughout the development of the characters. In Lord of the Flies. the primary character. Jack. is genuinely evil. Jack is a barbarous male child and he performs many violent Acts of the Apostless during his quest for power. The best illustration of this is when Jack encourages his folk to take part in the slaughtering of the beatific Simon ( Golding. 140 ) . While the folk is holding a wild. diabolic ceremonial. Simon crawls out of the forests disorientated after enduring a ictus. Mistaking Simon for the animal. the deranged folk. including Ralph. viciously rips Simon apart with their bare custodies and dentitions. Simon falls off of the drop and onto the beach below. where his organic structure washes out to sea. In comparing. immorality is besides outstanding in the narrative Animal Farm. The character Napoleon is the kernel of immorality in Animal Farm. He is the really manipulative and dictator-like leader of the farm. He performs many indefinable Acts of the Apostless against his fellow animate beings. such as taking the milk and apples for himself ( Orwell. 24 ) . After taking all of the milk and apples. Napoleon gets Squealer. a hog that he uses for propaganda intents. to explicate his â€Å"reason† for taking the milk and apples from them. Squealer provinces that Napoleon needs to take the milk and apples from the animate beings so that Napoleon has strong encephalon power. Squealer continues to explicate that Napoleon needs to hold good encephalon power because â€Å"the whole direction and administration of the farm depends on Napoleon† ( Orwell. 32 ) . Squealer so elaborates even more and says to the animate beings that â€Å"it is for YOUR interest that we drink that milk and eat those apples†¦Jones would come back! † ( Orwell. 32 ) . These grounds are non true. as Napoleon merely wants the milk and apples because he finds them tasty and non because he needs them to pull off the farm. Meanwhile. the other farm animate beings are left to travel hungry. In an effectual show of pure immorality. Orwell and Golding are able to utilize Napoleon and Jack as nefarious characters in an attempt to demo what happens to person with no ethical motives. In contrast. subjects of goodness are harder to happen. yet apparent in the word picture of Lord of the Fliess and Animal Farm. In Lord of the Flies. Simon is the prototype of morality. For illustration. he appears Christ-like as he helps the more vulnerable kids of the folk that the older male childs call the Littluns. Simon helps the Littluns by executing undertakings that they can non make. such as â€Å"picking pick fruit from subdivisions they can non reach† ( Golding. 50 ) . In comparing. Animal Farm besides has characters that reflect virtue. Specifically. Boxer is one character that shows his goodness through his actions. For illustration. in the Battle of the Cowshed. he sees his fellow animate beings being injured. so he stops the combat by kicking a stable-lad in the caput. As a consequence of Boxer’s actions. the worlds flee ( Orwell. 36 ) . Although Lord of the Fliess and Animal Farm are both predominately full of evil subjects. Golding and Orwell use subjects of goodness in the word picture to give the reader hope that good merely may predominate. Besides the subjects of immorality found in word picture. there are besides the subjects of immorality in the secret plan elements of Lord of the Fliess and Animal Farm. Towards the terminal of Lord of the Flies. Simon is murdered by the remainder of the male childs ( Golding. 142 ) . Simon’s decease is specifically the point when the immorality in the narrative victory over good. Up until the point of Simon’s decease. Ralph and Simon are the lone characters who still have good left in them. Since Ralph participates in Simon’s slaying. all of the good that exists in Ralph is gone and the last of civilisation dies with Simon. A similar immorality is present in Animal Farm when Napoleon anguishs and executes â€Å"traitors† of the farm. The animate beings that are accused of lese majesty are tortured until they admit to their offense. Once they confess. they are executed ( Orwell. 69 ) . Most of the clip. these animate beings are non even guilty. The animate beings live in a changeless fright ; they do non cognize when or if they will be accused of lese majesty and so executed. By utilizing subjects of immorality. both Golding and Orwell show that a deficiency of morality in society may finally ensue in the prostration of civilisation. In the same manner. subjects of good appear in the secret plan elements of Lord of the Fliess and Animal Farm. Specifically. there is a clip when Jack refuses to give Piggy any meat. Simon gives Piggy his portion because he believes that it is unjust that Jack did non give Piggy any meat. When Simon does non give Jack the satisfaction of eating his meat. Jack so gets highly angry with Simon and throws meat at Simon’s pess shouting â€Å"Eat. Damn you! † ( Golding. 68 ) . Simon still refuses to eat the meat. By his actions. Simon shows that even though they were populating in barbarian times. they could still stay sort to each other. Merely like Lord of the Flies. Animal Farm besides has subjects of goodness in its secret plan elements. In peculiar. Old Major creates a spirit of kindness and enthusiasm at the farm during his celebrated address. He uplifts the animate beings by singing them a vocal entitled â€Å"Beasts of England† . The vocal is about animate beings interrupting free from human control and life independently. Old Major continues to demo his concern for his fellow animate beings when he says in his address that â€Å"all animate beings are equal† ( Orwell. 11 ) . As a consequence of Orwell and Golding utilizing goodness in the secret plan elements of Animal Farm and Lord of the Flies. they are able to exemplify their point that one can take to be sort. no affair their milieus. Through word picture and secret plan elements. Golding and Orwell use good and evil in Lord of the Fliess and Animal Farm to show their fearful feelings for society. They believe that if society loses their touch of pureness and goodness so society will fall in. In other words. Golding and Orwell’s message to the reader is that it is human nature to transgress and execute immorality. and if society is non careful. it will finally take to the death of civilisation. Plants Cited Orwell. George. Animal Farm ; . New York: Harcourt. Brace. 1954. ( 11. 24. 32. 36. 69 ) . Print. Golding. William. Lord of the Flies. New York: Coward-McCann. 1962. ( 50. 68. 140. 142 ) . Print.